Disgrace
caught me by surprise. I didn't like the main character; I didn't like the events that happened in the book; but yet, as I turned the last page, I realized it was flat out brilliantly written. It definitely deserves its place on the shortlist for Best of the Bookers.
Before reading it, all I really knew about it was that a professor had an affair with a student. As it turns out, that's only a minor point. The book has several issues: men's subjugation of women, South Africa after apartheid, and animal rights. How Coetzee could say so much in just a little over 200 pages is amazing. There are several parallel stories going on. I want to say so much about it, but to do so would be to give away everything. I'm glad I was ignorant going into this novel, so I won't say much except that it will definitely get a re-read from me someday and preferably in a group setting. There would be many, many things to discuss.
(1999, 220 pp.)
As to the film, I thought it followed the book almost exactly. It was produced by Australians but I believe most of the outdoor shots at least were filmed in South Africa; the scenery was beautiful. John Malkovich played David Lurie exceptionally. My only small quibble is that his South African accent went in and out some. I thought the actress who played Lucy was also excellent. I highly recommend this movie
IF
you have read the book. You probably wouldn't appreciate it as much or at all if you haven't.
I was really intrigued when I heard about this book, so I pre-ordered it before the book came out. I have two sisters myself and all of us had the same excellent high school English teacher who taught Shakespeare with a passion. I know there was some variation from year to year in the plays that he covered, but I studied
Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, Othello,
and the
Merchant of Venice
. All three of us are Shakespeare fans as a result.
The book is essentially about three sisters who are all at turning points in their lives. Rosalind, Bianca, and Cordelia are all named from Shakespeare plays, not a coincidence as their father teaches courses on the Bard at the local college. Their mother is a homemaker and both parents have a strong influence on the sisters.
I love the first paragraph of the book:
"We came home because we were failures. We couldn't admit that, of course, not at first, not to ourselves, and certainly not to anyone else. We said we came home because our mother was ill, because we needed a break, a momentary pause before setting off for the Next Big Thing. But the truth was, we had failed, and rather than let anyone else know, we crafted careful excuses and alibis, and wrapped them around ourselves like a cloak to keep out the cold truth. The first stage: denial."
It's always nice to go home after failure, where people will love you whether you have failed or not. So, they go home to help their mother through her battle with cancer and to deal with their own failings the best they can. Each sister has her own storyline that's interesting, but the character that fascinated me the most was their mother. I definitely wanted to hear more of her back story and learn why she was the way she was. I think she really was the silent star in the book.
The book is peppered with Shakespeare quotes, and for the most part, I enjoyed them and was familiar with them. However, it got to be too much even for me after a bit and started to become a little annoying. I also really didn't like the two older sisters much, especially Bean (Bianca). Cordy was probably the only one that I enjoyed getting to know. Also, the plural narrator threw me for a loop at first, and I just really couldn't get used to that format.
All in all, I enjoyed this book about three very different sisters, but I think I'm a little less enthusiastic than most about it. If you have even one sister or you enjoy Shakespeare you will probably appreciate it.
"You can't build a car that violates the laws of physics. Same goes for a time machine. You can't go just anywhere, only to places it will let you go. You can only go to places that you will let yourself go."
...
"
But the reason I have job security is that people have no idea how to make themselves happy. Even with a time machine. I have job security because what the customer wants, when you get right down to it, is to relive his very worst moment, over and over and over again."
I want to read more books like this one -- philosophical, humorous, a little 'techy,' and demonstrating a great use of the English language. I really loved it. It reminded me a lot of how much I loved Rivka Galchen's
Atmospheric Disturbances
, also a NYT Notable book. But, just as with Galchen's novel, this one won't appeal to everyone.
It's really so difficult to even describe what's going on in this story. Guy works at a job fixing time machines. Not only does he fix time machines, but while he does it, he's in a time machine so he can travel to wherever the problem is. His operating system, TAMMY, and his not-really-alive dog, Ed, are the only ones to keep him company. He's been living in the time machine for a long time. Some incidents happen (don't want to spoil it), and he gets caught in a time loop. While in the time loop, he waxes philosophical about his parents, in particular his father, and just life in general. The book has all kinds of crazy diagrams and intended blank spaces to illustrate his points. (See pics below)
I really, really loved this book. I borrowed this from the library, so I plan on buying it when it comes out in paperback just so I can mark it up like crazy. Highly recommended for fans of offbeat, philosphical fiction.
"We talked about other things, too. About how the town seemed to have come back to life. All the Remember When stories in the paper had folks talking about the way Manifest used to be. And all the fine memories they had. And how people used to take care of each other."
Reading this book made me yearn a bit for my childhood. In the very first chapter, Abilene jumps from the train that is taking her to her new town. She wants to see it 'before it sees her.' I've never jumped from a train, but back in the old days in the 70's there were only 4 TV channels and kids were made to play outside and find adventure on their own. I was blessed to have such a childhood, and Abilene's childhood summer made me remember that.
While Abilene's story is set in the 1930's, part of her adventure takes her into the past of 1917 and 1918 as well. Abilene is shipped off by train by her father to the town of Manifest, Kansas to live with Shady, one of the town's ministers. She attends the last day of school, makes a couple of friends, and discovers some letters and artifacts in her new home. She takes these discoveries to the town diviner, Miss Sadie, who tells her stories of the town's past, with two boys in particular being the stars.
This started out just to be an average read for me, but I liked it more and more as I read on. With old newspaper clippings from the 'Reporter About Town' interspersed throughout the book, and stories of drought, immigration, World War I, bootlegging, and the Spanish Flu, I could clearly imagine this book being turned into film. I can just see the dusty old town now. Recommended for MG and YA historical fiction fans.
I love southern fiction, and I was especially interested in reading this book as the setting is in southeastern Mississippi, which is close to where I live now in Mobile, Alabama. I use to read a lot more mysteries than I read now, particularly in the early 1990s, but I'm not a fan of gritty content, so I've drifted more into literary fiction over the years. I was pleasantly relieved, when, for the most part, this book turned out to be more character driven and written in a literary style without the typical gory descriptions of many modern novels. It's a page turner and I read it pretty much straight through.
The two main characters are Larry (white), called 'Scary Larry' by the locals, and Silas (black), the local policeman. Growing up, the two were friends for a time when they lived in close proximity to each other. Then when Larry was in high school, he was accused by the community of killing a girl after a date, although the body was never found and Larry was never formally charged. Due to all this, Larry lives a lonely life in almost total isolation, with only his books (mostly horror) to keep him company.
Fast forward about 20 years and now another girl is missing. Naturally, the police consider Larry 'a person of interest' in the case, and Silas, his old boyhood friend, must get involved in trying to solve the girl's disappearance.
This book is about a lot more than just the mysteries of the two girls' disappearances. It's about race, class, friendship, and family. I enjoyed it and would definitely read another book by this author, especially if Silas were one of the characters.
Crooked Letter Crooked Letter
is on the shortlist for the 2011 Edgar Awards.
Larry's Party
is the third novel I've read by Carol Shields; it won the Orange Prize in 1998. Having loved the previous two,
The Stone Diaries
and (especially)
Unless
, I had high hopes for this one as well. However, it didn't really live up to my expectations.
Over the course of his life, Larry Weller goes from flower arranger at a flower store to a master designer of landscape mazes. I'm not that into botany, so that part was only marginally interesting to me; however, I would definitely like to visit some of the mazes described in the book, particularly in Europe. More interesting to me was the progression in Larry's thought life and love life over the course of the book. He starts out not knowing much about himself or what he wants in his twenties and of course knowing himself infinitely better by the time he's in his late forties. Youth is so wasted on the young, right? (Not that there aren't exceptions to you youngsters out there!) Being in my early forties, I definitely related to that aspect of the book.
"He (Larry) is recovering; in a sense he's spent his whole life in a state of recovery, but has only begun, at age forty-five, to breathe in the vital foreknowledge of what will become of the sovereign self inside him, that luxurious ornament. He'd like that self to be more musical and better lit, he'd like to possess a more meticulous sense of curiosity, and mostly he'd like someone, some thing to love. He's getting close. He feels it. He's halfway awake now, and about to wake up fully."
Some of the aspects I didn't like about the book are that it was a little boring in places, i.e. the botany and the fact that Larry is just a regular Joe with not much in the way of personality. I think that was supposed to be the point, though. There is even a chapter dedicated to his name and what the stereotypes of "Larrys" are. Another aspect is that in quite a few places she repeats details that we already know about characters or events. I know that was by design, but I'm not sure I liked it. Also, it is a bit raunchy in places. There's a chapter called "Larry's P#n*s" that goes on and on in very descriptive detail about that specific body part and all the different names for it that people use. Some people would find that extremely funny, I'm sure, but I could have done without the more graphic parts of that chapter.
The last chapter is called "Larry's Party," and that chapter and the dinner party itself wrapped up everything in Larry's life to that point very nicely. I really liked the metaphor that our lives are mazes. Sometimes there's only one way in and one way out. Sometimes there are four exits. But always, there is the 'goal' in the center. Honestly, the last chapter made me lift my rating from 3 1/2 stars to 4. It was very cleverly done. And although this book was my least favorite of Shields' books so far, I still plan on reading many more if not all of her works. I really do think she was an amazing writer.
Winner, 1999 Booker Prize
2011 Newbery Medal
I love southern fiction, and I was especially interested in reading this book as the setting is in southeastern Mississippi, which is close to where I live now in Mobile, Alabama. I use to read a lot more mysteries than I read now, particularly in the early 1990s, but I'm not a fan of gritty content, so I've drifted more into literary fiction over the years. I was pleasantly relieved, when, for the most part, this book turned out to be more character driven and written in a literary style without the typical gory descriptions of many modern novels. It's a page turner and I read it pretty much straight through.
