"Now I realized that the least deluded of all women was the prostitute. That marriage was the system built on the most cruel suffering of women."
Woman at Point Zero
was written by Nawal El Saadawi in 1975. This feminist Egyptian author has quite a resume. She became a doctor in her early twenties in 1955. She campaigned against female circumcision in Egypt for over 50 years, with the practice not becoming illegal until 2008. Early in her career she lost her job as Director of Public Health because of her campaign. Later, she was even imprisoned by the Sadat regime over a political matter. And, not only that, she has written at least 16 books on women's issues.
This book was written as a result of her visiting a woman in prison. While she was studying neurosis in women, another doctor told her about a prisoner who refused to ask for a pardon from the President for the crime of killing her pimp. After the author heard the woman's story, she couldn't sleep for days until she started writing this book. (Source: BBC interview below)
Firdaus tells her life story from the beginning, from being touched by her uncle inappropriately, to being married off and beaten by her 60+ year old husband, to being raped and then finally becoming a prostitute. It is a harrowing story and one I won't easily forget. The book is short and it is structured to repeat in a few places, but this was intentionally done by the author to good effect. Highly recommended for those interested in women's issues and feminist fiction.
"Everybody has to die. I prefer to die for a crime I have committed rather than to die for one of the crimes which you have committed."
Author interview with BBC World Book Club:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version
here
. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
I don't know where to even start with this book. I highlighted passages on almost every page.
So Long a Letter
is an insightful look at one woman's pain and anguish when her husband takes another (much younger) wife. The book actually begins with Ramatoulaye's widowhood. Her husband has just died and she is writing a letter to a friend about her feelings on her marriage, her husband's taking of another wife (allowed in Islam), and her husband's death.
Ramatoulaye, a Senegalese teacher, has 12 children, and her husband has run off (without telling her) and married her oldest daughter's best friend. Sort of makes for a bad day. This is what her husband's friends tell her, and her thoughts about it:
'You can't resist the imperious laws that demand food and clothing for man. These same laws compel the "male" in other respects. I say "male" to emphasie the bestiality of instincts... You understand....A wife must understand, once and for all, and must forgive; she must not worry herself about "betrayals of the flesh." The important thing is what there is in the heart; that's what unites two beings inside.' (He struck his chest, at the point where the heart lies.)
'Driven to the limits of my resistance, I satisfy myself with what is within reach. It's a terrible thing to say. Truth is ugly when one analyses it.'
Thus, to justify himself, he reduced young Nabou to a 'plate of food.' Thus, for the sake of 'variety,' men are unfaithful to their wives.
I was irritated. He was asking me to understand. But to understand what? The supremacy of instinct? The right to betray? The justification of the desire for variety? I couldn't be an ally to polygamic instincts. What, then was I to understand?
Another strong passage:
I had never known the sordid side of marriage. Don't get to know! Run from it! When one begins to forgive, there is an avalanche of faults that comes crashing down, and the only thing that remains is to forgive again, to keep on forgiving. Leave, escape from betrayal!
Ramatoulaye doesn't 'leave' her husband; they do not divorce, a fact which surprises her husband and, it is implied, irritates him. He never goes back to her, even though they are still married. As Ramatoulaye adjusts to her new life, she appreciates even more the value of friendship:
Friendship has splendours that love knows not. It grows stronger when crossed, whereas obstacles kill love. Friendship resists time, which wearies and severs couples. It has heights unknown to love.
Ramatoulaye also must raise her children alone (even before her husband's death), with all the trials and tribulations that entails. But, she is obviously grateful for her children. On motherhood, Ramatoulaye states:
And also, one is a mother in order to understand the inexplicable. One is a mother to lighten the darkness. One is a mother to shield when lightning streaks the night, when thunder shakes the earth, when mud bogs one down. One is a mother in order to love without beginning or end.
I highly recommend this book to all, but especially those interested in women's issues or in African fiction.
Note: This book is one of the new additions to the
1001 list
.
1979 (French), 1981 for the English translation
90 pp.
'Math has proven the existence of God, because it is absolute and without contradiction; but the devil must exist as well, because we cannot prove it.'
Absolutely wonderful -- I loved this book!!
Have you seen the movie
50 First Dates
? It's one of my favorite movies, and a very similar situation occurs in this book. A mathematics professor has only 80 minutes of short term memory due to a car accident, but he remembers everything clear as a bell that happened before his head injury. He continues to solve mathematical proofs and has an uncanny ability to know exactly where the North Star is in the sky, even when there's no visibility. He is kind and has a great love for children. But, he remembers only 80 minutes at a time in the here and now. His sister-in-law lets him live in a cottage next to her main house, and she has hired a ninth housekeeper to cook and clean for the professor.
The housekeeper does her best to please the professor and works around his disability. She tells him about her 10 year old son, and he insists on letting the son come to his cottage after school, even though it's against the cleaning agency's rules. The professor writes notes to himself to help remind him of the housekeeper and her son. The boy and the professor both have a love of baseball, and the professor uses this to teach the boy mathematics. Soon a strong bond is formed among the three of them.
There is quite a bit of math in this book, and of course I enjoyed those references tremendously. I have an engineering degree, and mathematics has always been a love of mine. I don't think you have to know math like I do to enjoy this book, but you will certainly appreciate the beauty of it a bit more if you do.
'Eternal truths are ultimately invisible, and you won't find them in material things or natural phenomena, or even in human emotions. Mathematics, however, can illuminate them, can give them expression -- in fact, nothing can prevent it from doing so.'
Very highly recommended!!
2003, 2009 for the English translation by Stephen Snyder, 180 pp
.
[Disclaimer: This copy was received from the LibraryThing Early Reviewers program.]
This slim book by Lydia Chukovskaya is a must read if you're interested in Russian/Soviet history. It reminded me a bit of
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
, except that instead of the prisoner's point of view, we get the view of the mothers and wives of the falsely imprisoned.
At the beginning of the book, Sofia is happily working as the supervising typist for a government publishing house. Her son Kolya is deeply committed to the Soviet party and is studying engineering. Then everything slowly goes downhill and '
The Great Purge
' begins. People start disappearing. Masses of people. Multitudes of women stand in line each day in front of government offices to determine the fate of their loved ones. All are convinced it is only a big mistake, but then they themselves are deported.
This book was actually written during the time of the purges (1937-1938), but it was hidden for several years for obvious reasons and then almost published in the Soviet Union in the early sixties. Political change occurred again, and it wasn't published in Chukovskaya's home country, but it was published in France and in the United States. The book was finally published in the Soviet Union in 1988.
I almost never read forewords, author's notes, or afterwords, but I did in this case because I was fascinated by the author's own struggle to get the book published. As I said, a must read for Russian history enthusiasts.
"There's only one thing I want, just one thing I'm waiting for: to see my book published in the Soviet Union. In my own country. In Sofia Petrovna's country. I have been waiting patiently for thirty-four years.
There is but one tribunal to which I wish to offer my novella: that of my countrymen, young and old, particularly the old, those who lived through the same thing which befell me and that woman so different from me whom I chose as the heroine of my narrative -- Sofia Petrovna, one of thousands I saw all about me.
"
1967 for the English translation, 120 pp.
Rating: 5/5
What a wonderful book! I enjoyed
Anne of Green Gables
, but I absolutely adored
Anne of Avonlea
. Now a schoolteacher, Anne is much admired by her students. I loved the sweet descriptions of Anne's pupils. I enjoyed meeting the new cast of characters as well: Mr. Harrison and his parrot, Miss Lavender and her lovely stone house, the twins Davy and Dora, and the motherless Paul Irving. I anxiously await
Anne of the Island
.
I listened to the CD read by Barbara Caruso. What an excellent narrator. I wouldn't hesitate at all to listen to one of her audiobooks again.
Perhaps, after all, romance did not come into one's life with pomp and blare, like a gay knight riding down; perhaps it crept to one's side like an old friend through quiet ways; perhaps it revealed itself in seeming prose, until some sudden shaft of illumination flung athwart its pages betrayed the rhythm and the music, perhaps. . . perhaps. . .love unfolded naturally out of a beautiful friendship, as a golden-hearted rose slipping from its green sheath.
Then the veil dropped again; but the Anne who walked up the dark lane was not quite the same Anne who had driven gaily down it the evening before. The page of girlhood had been turned, as by an unseen finger, and the page of womanhood was before her with all its charm and mystery, its pain and gladness.
I finished
Dracula
on audio this week and loved it. Now my sons and husband are listening to it as well. The unabridged edition, of course. It is creepy and scary, and I normally don't like creepy and scary, but Bram Stoker's novel is so well done and, obviously, the beginning of it all. I'm thinking of getting this annotated edition at left that comes out on October 13. It even has an introduction by Neil Gaiman. I'll probably use this edition for a future re-read.
We started to watch the movie starring Gary Oldman, but it wasn't appropriate for kids (my kids at least) so we quit. I still may watch it at a later date. I would love to see a modern version that was faithful to the book.
Something that surprised and pleased me while reading the book was the strong Christian faith of some of the characters. I didn't expect that at all, and I do wonder about Stoker's own beliefs. He was rumored to have been part of a secret, magical order that included the occultist Aleister Crowley.
Also, I read on
Publisher's Weekly
that Bram Stoker's great-grandnephew Dacre Stoker and Dracula documentarian and historian Ian Holt are going to be writing
Dracula: the Undead
. The publisher will be Dutton, and it is scheduled to be released in October, 2009.
"A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (
John 13:34-35
,
ESV
)
This slim book by Lydia Chukovskaya is a must read if you're interested in Russian/Soviet history. It reminded me a bit of
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
, except that instead of the prisoner's point of view, we get the view of the mothers and wives of the falsely imprisoned.
I finished
Dracula
on audio this week and loved it. Now my sons and husband are listening to it as well. The unabridged edition, of course. It is creepy and scary, and I normally don't like creepy and scary, but Bram Stoker's novel is so well done and, obviously, the beginning of it all. I'm thinking of getting this annotated edition at left that comes out on October 13. It even has an introduction by Neil Gaiman. I'll probably use this edition for a future re-read.
